Sentence examples for considering prevalence from inspiring English sources

Another mechanism by which we might determine the quality of this work is to measure it against standard criteria for quality when considering prevalence studies.

Considering prevalence studies where non-infected cats were included, there seems to be consensus that the probability of FIV infection is higher for cats that roam outdoors [ 9, 41] due increased opportunity for transmission via fights.

Despite the minor change in CFA prevalence between these two surveys, the Bm14 antibody response decreased significantly, both when considering prevalence of positivity (from 16.9% to 11.4%, p = 0.026; Pearsons chi-square test) and GMI of OD-values (from 0.2776 to 0.2153, p = 0.032, t-test).

A PHC provides coverage to at least 30,000 population of which approximately 18,000 would be having age more than 15 years, which could mean about 3600 adults with hypertension, and about 600 with diabetes mellitus considering prevalence of hypertension and diabetes to be 20 and 3.3 % respectively.

If this would have been considered, prevalence of phenotype-positive cases would have likely increased.

We did not use another proposed definition for NND [ 20] because it did not consider prevalence [ 21].

When we consider prevalence estimates for different demographics indicators such as age (continuous and categorical), gender, race and ethnicity, education and annual household income, underestimates range from 7.3%to13.9%9%.

In our study apart from ASA gene expression measurement, we decided also to consider prevalence of enterococcal prophages pp1 and pp4, newly described elements involved in adherence of the bacterial strain.

From the perspective of policy-makers and service providers, a common limitation of most research on neurological conditions is the tendency to only consider prevalence in the general population rather than within specific care settings.

We considered prevalences 50% higher and 50% lower than those in the study population.

A similar pattern of statistical identifiability is seen as we vary β and consider prevalences between 0.25% and 0.65%.