Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Each of the eight different KSQ questions were dichotomized and evaluated separately, considering a score of ≥3 as clinically relevant [39, 42].
Regression analysis was done as follows: Logistic regression was performed on the various risk factors for each subscale considering a score of ≤ 85 to be an abnormal outcome.
We recorded tooth sensitivity for the entire dentition in patients with AI using a visual analogue scale (VAS), considering a score below 3 to indicate no or low pain [ 31] The AI group contained 26 patients diagnosed with severe AI who needed crown therapy.
Similar(57)
In PCA, samples are classified according to similarity, thus when considering a scores plot when two samples have neighboring coordinates they are more similar; the farther they are from each other, the more dissimilar.
The BBC considers a score 85 or above "excellent"; "Victory of the Daleks" and "Amy's Choice" were the only ones to come below that, with 84.
We considered a score above 0.65 to implicate a sufficient internal consistency.
Thus we considered a score of ≥13.5 s indicated a low physical performance.
In this study we considered a score ≥4 to indicate high ambivalence.
Annear et al. (2014) consider a score <9 to be methodologically weak.
We propose to consider a score from 0 12 points as normal and a higher score as indicative of PI symptoms.
Finally, we considered a score based on a direct test for normality using the Wilk-Shapiro test (WS) [ 46].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com