Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
A C t value between 34 and 36 was considered weakly positive.
In the final analysis, however, scores 0 and 1 were considered negative; score 2 was considered weakly positive; and score 3 was considered strongly positive.
In both, the band representing β-globin DNA in the porta hepatis fragment was considered weakly positive, while the corresponding hepatic band was considered strongly positive.
Sum scores (score (i) + score (ii)) < 3 were considered weakly positive, 3 5 points were considered positive, and >5 was considered strongly positive.
Samples with a Ct value <30 were considered positive, samples with a Ct value of 30-35 and with sigmoidal/logarithmic appearance were considered weakly positive, and samples with a Ct value >35 were considered negative.
The staining expression was considered weakly positive, when 1 25% of the cells were found positive, moderately positive, when 26%50%% of cells were positive and strongly positive when >50% of cells were positive for both MMP-2 and TIMP-2.
Similar(52)
When strong positive selection occurs, selective constraint is reduced so that the proportion of mutations that can be considered weakly deleterious may be increased.
An optical density below 1.0 is considered weakly reactive [ 13].
Immunoreaction was considered as weakly positive (2+) when more than 10% of the tumour cells showed weak to moderate complete membrane staining or as strongly positive (3+) when a strong complete membrane staining was observed in more than 10% of the tumour cells.
Similarly, FoldIndex considers weakly hydrophobic regions of high net charge.
Scores were considered negative (0 1), weakly positive (2 4), moderately positive (6 8), and strongly positive (9 12).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com