Exact(29)
Overall, and on average across the algorithms we considered, we found that this combination was the most successful, with prediction accuracies typically improving by over 1%.
Interestingly, when headache frequency was considered, we found that non-migrainous headache <7 days/month was 18% more likely among individuals with high caffeine consumption than among those with lowest consumption.
The results from the present study need to be carefully considered; we found that compared to non-swimmers, swimmers have wider, more harmonious dental arches, with less crossbite and open bite, and with moderate crowding; this is accompanied by significantly limited incidence of oral habits.
However, when the kinetic profiles of activation of these pathways were considered, we found substantial differences between the kinetics of activation induced by each TLR2 ligand.
When the proportion-to-total badge feather length and area (i.e. relative length and area) was considered, we found similar non-significant effects for both badge feather parts (all F<3.05, all P>0.09).
Independently of the values of replacement rate and ancestral migration rate (m0) considered, we found that our approach identifies the "correct" model in more than 98% of the cases (out of the 200 pseudodatasets simulated for each pairwise comparison, see Materials and Methods for a full explanation).
Similar(31)
In all cases considered, we find similar distribution functions.
Across the seven WADA classes considered, we find a combination of expected and unexpected protein targets for their constituent molecules.
When only spatial information is considered, we find that in some cases the uniqueness of the mobility data can still get close to 100%.
Adapting (1.5) to the configurations considered, we find 2 B = ∫ ψ 1 ψ 2 cos τ d τ B U 0 2 + 2 ( 1 − cos τ ).
When differences in generation time are considered, we find an exponential increase in maximum mammal body mass during the 35 million years following the Cretaceous Paleogene (K Pg) extinction event.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com