Sentence examples for considered violation from inspiring English sources
"considered violation" is a correct and usable phrase in written English
It is commonly used to describe actions or behaviors that are deemed to be in violation of rules, laws, or moral principles. For example, "The destruction of ancient ruins is considered a violation of cultural heritage." This sentence implies that most people or authorities would view the act of destroying ancient ruins as a violation of something valuable and important. Another example could be, "Leaking confidential information is considered a violation of trust." This sentence suggests that the action of leaking confidential information is seen as a breach of trust between individuals or organizations.
Trials where rats exited the center port during the fixation period were considered violation trials, aborted, and a new trial was started.
Therefore, the visits may be considered violations of N.C.A.A. recruiting rules.
Many of the above examples could be considered violations of international law.
Attacks on civilians have been considered violations of those principles for hundreds of years.
In those legal systems, collectively referred to as cuneiform law, crimes were considered violations of other people's rights.
Telling Americans about secret presidential actions that threaten our fundamental law should never be considered violations of the Espionage Act.
Coalition officials also reported that Iraqi forces had fought out of uniform, had flown false flags of surrender and then attacked, and had massed civilians to shield themselves from attack, all considered violations of the codes of war.
It is not clear why any of these publications were considered violations of prison rules – a request by the Guardian to the army public affairs team for an explanation of the charges received no immediate response.
This office was supposed to handle abuse cases only when they were considered violations of the sacrament of Confession, before the policies were clarified in 2001 and the doctrinal office took on all the abuse cases.
The problem, Dr. Etzioni and others say, is that the available options — establishing a national identity database, tracking users' behavior or knowing the data on a person's phone that might suggest an age group — are considered violations of privacy.
This could include opportunities warning notices and allowances to rectify non-compliance, particularly if they are minor, before they are considered violations and prior to publications or fines.
