Exact(5)
The assessment was considered unambiguous (86%), encouraging (90%), and less stressful than exams (81%).
However, these data cannot be considered unambiguous since the ratio of ЕС50 between deamidated and native forms varies with different gluten peptides [ 6].
Peptide matches were considered unambiguous if ion scores were significant (p < 0.05), and protein identifications included at least one top-ranking peptide match with a score above the significance threshold.
Matches to Synechocystis proteins were considered unambiguous when the probability score was significant using the Mascot score with a p value < 0.05 and when there was a minimum of five peptides and with a sequence coverage greater than 20%.
However, if the set of closely related proteins is incomplete, a high α may result in erroneous contig protein couplings that are considered unambiguous, thereby leading to scaffolding errors.
Similar(54)
Moreover, the large-scale extension may be limited by considering unambiguous kinetic model parameterization [89].
This result holds even when one only considers unambiguous, totally acyclic inheritance networks.
He identifies the non-rational soul with the "disorderly and maleficent soul" of Laws X (a testimony Plutarch himself considers unambiguous, De Iside 370F), with the "limitlessness" of the Philebus (26b), the "congenital desire" and "inbred character" of the Politicus (272d, 273b), and with the necessity (anankê) and the generation (genesis) of Timaeus 52d (De an. procr.
Early on, the whooping-cough vaccine was considered an unambiguous success story_._ Over time, though, scientists — as well as crusading vaccine skeptics — raised concerns about the shots' side effects, which could include high fever and, occasionally, seizures.
In fact, the new sentence for Mr. Khodorkovsky — which will keep him in prison until 2017 — was considered an unambiguous signal that Mr. Putin, now prime minister, remains in control of the country in advance of a presidential election in 2012, which he might enter.
Questions and instructions were considered clear, unambiguous, logical, grammatically correct and free of excess wording.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com