Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
considered time for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "considered time for" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to express a notion of recognizing or acknowledging a specific duration for something, but it lacks clarity and proper structure. Example: "We have considered time for reflection before making our final decision."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
Given their relative inattention to context and difficulties in disentangling cause and effect, it might be considered time for radical change to, or even abandonment of, such studies.
Science
Coming from vibrant universities where the post-seminar question period was considered time for an intellectual free-for-all, sometimes taking on the nature of a food fight, I must say I had a hard time dealing with the change.
Science & Research
The same pattern can be seen in our results as well: men and women who opted for surgical specialties had the same low rating in combining work with family, whereas among those who preferred family medicine it was only women – not men – who considered time for family to be important.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
Furthermore, we measured only the associations between baggage handler seniority and current musculoskeletal symptoms without considering time for onset of the symptoms or the way the symptoms started.
Science
Since releasing the resources is relatively instantaneous in contrast, we therefore consider times for booting and setup, and then benchmark run times for STREAM, Bonnie++, IOZone and LINPACK.
In this work, we consider time step control for variational-monolithic fluid structure interaction.
We consider time series models for chest radiograph data obtained from Midwest children's emergency departments.
Therefore, it is significant to consider time-varying delay for the prescribed mean curvature equations.
This time is often considered prep time for the students' regular classroom teachers, who are not responsible for the students' education in these particular content areas.
September is considered a time for fresh beginnings.
News & Media
In the weekday 6 a.m. to 10 a.m. time period, considered prime time for radio, KROQ-FM (106.7) returned to the No. 1 spot (5.2% share).
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When discussing scheduling, opt for phrases like "allocate time for" or "set aside time for" to clearly convey the act of designating time for a specific purpose.
Common error
Avoid using "considered time for" in formal writing. It often leads to convoluted sentences. Simplify by using stronger verbs like "allocate", "schedule", or "designate" to make your writing clearer and more direct.
Source & Trust
76%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "considered time for" functions as part of a clause where "considered" acts as a verb, but the overall structure is not grammatically correct in standard English. Ludwig AI indicates its incorrectness. Correct alternatives include phrases where verbs like "allocate", "schedule", or "designate" are used.
Frequent in
Science
33%
News & Media
33%
Wiki
33%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "considered time for" might be understood in some contexts, it's generally not grammatically sound and should be avoided in formal writing. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment. Instead, opting for clearer and more direct alternatives like "allocated time for", "scheduled time for", or "designated time for" will enhance the clarity and professionalism of your writing. Remember to prioritize clear communication by choosing precise language and grammatically correct phrasing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
Allocated time for
Focuses on the act of designating a specific duration for an activity.
Scheduled time for
Emphasizes the planning and arrangement of time for a particular purpose.
Designated time for
Highlights the official assignment of time to a specific task or event.
Set aside time for
Indicates reserving a portion of time for a specific activity, emphasizing its importance.
Made time for
Implies actively creating or finding time within a busy schedule.
Reserved time for
Suggests that time has been kept available for a specific action.
Planned time for
Highlights the purposeful integration of time for something into a broader agenda.
Allowed time for
Focuses on permitting or granting a specific duration.
Budgeted time for
Emphasizes time as a resource that needs to be carefully managed and distributed.
Factored in time for
Implies incorporating time for something as a necessary element in a calculation or plan.
FAQs
What's a clearer way to phrase "considered time for"?
Instead of "considered time for", use more direct phrases such as "allocated time for", "scheduled time for", or "designated time for" to improve clarity.
How can I avoid using "considered time for" in my writing?
Reframe your sentence to use active verbs. For example, instead of "time was considered for review", try "we scheduled time for review" or "we allocated time for review".
Is "considered time for" grammatically correct?
While understandable in some contexts, "considered time for" is not the most grammatically sound phrase. Using alternatives like "set aside time for" or "made time for" provides better grammatical structure.
When is it appropriate to use "considered time for"?
It's generally better to avoid "considered time for" in formal writing. However, it might appear in informal contexts. In formal settings, aim for more precise alternatives such as "planned time for" or "factored in time for".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
76%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested