Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
Because this is the same approach used in Rüter [16] and applied by the majority of EU countries for the submissions for FMRL, we considered this method as Approach 0 (AP0).
Archimedes may have considered this method lacking in formal rigor, so he also used the method of exhaustion to derive the results.
Those authors considered this method the gold standard for asynchrony detection [ 44].
However, for the purpose of this study, we considered this method very reliable and our animals were all instrumented with pulmonary artery catheters with continuous SvO2 monitoring.
We considered this method more appropriate than the contact-plate method [ 23], because the contact-plate method requires the sampled skin surface to be flat.
In our study population, we found a very low frequency of unacceptable immunosuppressive target levels, 7% (data not shown), we then considered this method to be inadequate to use for validation.
Similar(50)
Further, we consider this method can be applied to any other volcanoes emitting measurable SO2 flux.
We therefore consider this method as one option for maxillary single-first-molar replacement. .
We consider this method important for inter-manufacturer result comparability because it is the standard.
The first considers this method as a novel procedure to analyse supersaturated designs.
Although some disadvantages were reported such as increasing stiffness of the abdominal wall and abdominal pressure, American College of Surgeons considers this method as a gold standard in hernia repair [22 24].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com