Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
To compare the performance of SDC with that of each isolated program, as we did for Cdk2, for each protein target we considered the same number (n test ) of top-ranked molecules as nCM and counted the number of actives among them.
During these previous simulations, the authors considered the same number of mutations and meiotic recombinations in the modeling genome as their particular chromosomal segment has in reality.
Similar(58)
For simplicity of notations, we consider the same number of nodes in all groups, i.e., N l = Nmw,.
We also normalized the data considering the same number of sequences to all samples (Table S1), and, despite the higher diversity of oiled samples were not so evident, the differences and similarities between samples were not significantly affected.
Note that these two IC are equivalent when the models considered have the same number of parameters (the non-nested case), as when comparing the inclusion of a variable in either of the two sub-models (embryo or uterus).
The order of the numbers drawn isn't important as 1-2-3-4 isamensidered the sase 2-3-1-4 2-3-1-4 2-3-1-4 2-3-1-4
Usually both graphs are considered the same.
The days of admission to the hospital were considered to be the same number of days spent on each laboratory procedure.
The days of admission to the hospital were considered to be the same number of days used on each laboratory activity.
Although the considered system comprises the same number of molecular processes than the previously regarded one, even the complete mechanistic model already consists of a lower number of ODEs.
Considering that approximately the same number of nanofibers was present in all the samples, the coplanar (BC/BG) configuration exhibits a lower output current than the staggered geometries due to a high contact resistance associated with the high injection barrier to the organic material [32].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com