Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
considered started
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "considered started" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express that something has been deemed to have begun, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear. Example: "The project was considered started after the initial meeting took place."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Science
Wiki
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
Michele Norris, one of the hosts of NPR's afternoon broadcast, All Things Considered, started The Race Card Project to "help foster a candid dialogue about race".
News & Media
The studies considered started between 1979 and 1995.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
Have you ever considered starting a singing group with Democrats?
News & Media
He even considered starting an Arabic- and English-language newspaper there.
News & Media
Arlio didn't even know anyone suffering from kidney failure before she considered starting a chain.
News & Media
I considered starting a petition to lower the number of games played each year.
News & Media
Have you considered starting your own side hustle small business and being your own boss?
News & Media
These organisations never considered starting a reimbursement process and did not cooperate with the pharmaceutical industry.
Science
If not, consider starting an independent business.
News & Media
Would I consider starting up my residential business again?
News & Media
D'Antoni said he was considering starting Robinson at point guard.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using the phrase "considered started" in formal writing. Instead, opt for more grammatically sound alternatives such as "deemed to have started" or "regarded as begun".
Common error
A common mistake is to directly combine "considered" with "started" without an auxiliary verb like "to be" or "to have". Always ensure proper verb conjugation when using "considered" in conjunction with another verb. For example, use "considered starting" or "considered to have started" instead.
Source & Trust
78%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "considered started" functions as a verb phrase, though its grammatical correctness is questionable. As Ludwig AI highlights, it is not a standard or clear construction in English. The intended function is often to indicate that something has been regarded or deemed to have begun.
Frequent in
News & Media
33%
Science
33%
Wiki
33%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "considered started" is grammatically questionable and rarely used in formal English. Ludwig AI's analysis suggests that it is not a standard construction, and more precise alternatives like "deemed to have started" or "regarded as begun" are generally preferred. While the phrase may appear in neutral to informal contexts, such as news articles or wiki entries, writers should exercise caution and opt for clearer, more grammatically sound alternatives to ensure effective communication.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
considered beginning
Replaces "started" with a synonym focusing on the initial phase.
deemed to have started
Offers a more grammatically correct and formal way to say something was officially regarded as begun.
regarded as started
Similar to "deemed to have started", but slightly less formal.
thought about starting
Focuses on the act of contemplating the commencement of something.
considered initiating
Replaces "started" with a more formal synonym.
contemplated starting
Highlights the deliberation process before beginning.
was considering starting
Specifies that the consideration of starting was ongoing at some point.
had considered starting
Indicates the consideration of starting happened in the past.
once considered starting
Emphasizes that the consideration of starting occurred at a specific time in the past.
have considered starting
Highlights the relevance of past consideration to the present.
FAQs
Is "considered started" grammatically correct?
No, the phrase "considered started" is not grammatically correct. A more appropriate phrasing would be "deemed to have started" or "regarded as begun".
What are some alternatives to "considered started"?
Alternatives include "deemed to have started", "regarded as started", or "considered beginning".
How can I use "consider" and "start" correctly in a sentence together?
You can say "considered starting" (e.g., "He considered starting a new business") or use a passive construction like "was considered to have started" (e.g., "The project was considered to have started last month").
What is the difference between "considered starting" and "considered to have started"?
"Considered starting" implies a continuous action or contemplation, while "considered to have started" implies a completed action or a point in the past when something was regarded as begun. For example, “He considered starting a new business” suggests he's thinking about it, whereas “The project was considered to have started” means it was determined the project began.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
78%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested