Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
The only really considered remarks of the lot, because they were written (in response to Scott Horton's written questions) rather than stammered off the cuff, may be found on the Web site of Harper's magazine.
The considered remarks about the educational process and what constitutes "best practice" and what does not were worthy.
Similar(56)
And how is the world supposed to consider remarks by the pope that are not official church teaching?
For a depressing example of how members of Congress can be spoon-fed the views and even the exact words of high-powered lobbying firms, consider remarks inserted into the Congressional Record after the debate and vote on health care reform in the House.
Remark 2.8 If we consider Remarks 2.5 and 2.7, we get the following relation between Laguerre polynomials L n ( x ) and Bessel polynomials y n ( x, α, β ) : In this section we introduce the following two-parameter family of bivariate polynomials: S n m 1, m 2 ( x, y ) : = ∑ k = 0 n A m 1 + m 2 + n, m 2 + k x k k ! y n − k ( n − k ) ! ( m 1, m 2, n, k ∈ N 0 ), (7).
Let us consider Remark 1.
For the triangle inequality it is enough that we consider Remark 1.1 and (m4).
Considering Remark 1.13, we know that ({2^{-m}f(2^{m}x)}) is a Cauchy sequence.
Considering Remark 1.13, we know that ({2^{m}f (frac{x}{2^{m}} )}) is a Cauchy sequence.
Considering Remark 2.2, we obtain the following corollary as a consequence of Theorem 2.5.
By considering Remark 2.4, we can have the following consequences of Theorem 2.7.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com