The article explores similarities and differences between ES prioritization and biodiversity prioritization, and highlights several key components that need to be considered in prioritizing areas for protecting ES.
Here we describe the major factors that must be considered in ES prioritization and argue that addressing as many of these factors as possible will improve the outcomes of multi-objective prioritization frameworks that aim to promote human well-being through the protection of services.
With this knowledge, user demands are considered in the prioritization of technical requirements.
Bearers with insufficient radio channel quality are not considered in the prioritization algorithm and are assumed to set (F_{k}^{text {QCI}_{m}}=1).
Users with G Factor ≤−3 dB are assumed to have insufficient radio channel quality, and therefore, they are not considered in the prioritization algorithm (see Section 5.3).
One of the parameters that is considered in such prioritization exercises are the relative, actual, or perceived 'values' of the units being considered.
Our map should not be regarded as a top-down expert advice on a fixed set of criteria that should always be considered in all prioritization decisions, but rather as an aid to decision-makers in their selection of relevant criteria.
Thus, the spatial patterns of species-level data and intraspecific variation are different, suggesting that the former may not be a suitable representation of the latter, and that, if the goal is to maximize intraspecific variation, it should be considered in conservation prioritization.
It lists nine common themes for good practice that deserve to be considered in any health research prioritization exercise.
While avertable burden and cost-effectiveness are among these criteria, other critical factors considered in decision making and prioritization include (but are not limited to) externalities, horizontal and generational equity, political criteria, and affordability.
