Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(10)
Given that 95% of included studies were considered good quality, we can assume validity in the review findings.
Taking into account that PSNR values higher than 35 dB are usually considered good quality, this is only achieved under load conditions below 12 Mbps approximately.
Embryos scoring 3.0 3.5 were regarded as of top quality, those with a score of 2.5 were considered good quality, and 4 8 cell embryos with a score of at least 2.0 were considered suitable for cryopreservation.
A score not lower than 50%% is considered good quality.
All 291 samples contained the stated active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) of which 69% were considered good quality by chemical analysis.
The global score > 5 designates poor sleep quality while score ≤ 5 is considered good quality sleep [ 2].
Similar(50)
It's a very handy skill, a chameleon-like talent that can look like a lot of things that are considered good qualities for political leaders to have: confidence, strength, assertiveness and even intelligence.
As of sampling on Tuesday, the remaining grass fields have reached the low to mid 50s NDF, still within the range we would consider good quality, but with the expectation of NDF advancing 0.75 – 1.2 points per day will pass the optimum range this week.
Therefore systematic reviews may not capture what women consider good quality of care.
Since there are no gold standards, a CAT score above 75%% was considered good methodological quality, a score between 50 75 % was considered moderate quality and a score lower than 50%% was deemed to be of poor methodological quality.
The median Jadad score across the 107 RCTs was 4 on a five-point scale (IQR 3, 4); scores greater or equal to 3 are considered good methodological quality [9]; [9]].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com