Exact(4)
The clones with log ratios that exceed mean +/- 2 × SD of the invariant set were considered gains and losses, respectively.
For ease of annotation, data points differing from the normal reference sample with a log2 ratio of greater than 0.2 or less than -0.2 were considered gains or losses, respectively.
Formally, the genes that "appear" in LACA under our reconstruction have to come from somewhere; thus, they are considered gains in LACA in a purely formal sense, regardless of their history outside of the modern Archaea.
Although a third of the women considered gains of 1% in survival rates or 6 months in survival times sufficient to make their adjuvant endocrine therapy worthwhile, more than half the women required gains of at least 5% in survival rates or 3 years in survival time as necessary to make adjuvant endocrine therapy worthwhile.
Similar(56)
Revenge by young men is considered gain, even at the cost of their own lives, but old men who stay at home in times of war, and mothers who have sons to lose, know better.
This species has the most split Amy gene (14 introns), and 14 species-specific positions, which can be considered gained.
Segments with a probability score of ≥ 0.5 were considered gained, amplified or lost [ 15].
The clones with log2 ratios that exceed least than ± 0.25 were considered gain and loss of the copy number.
By default, any gene whose segmented log ratio is greater than 0.2 is considered gained and less than −0.2 is considered lost (thresholds are, however, customizable) and the total number of samples crossing these thresholds are calculated.
In the second strategy, we considered gaining power by using prior information, such as exploiting correlations between successive observations by Markov chain analysis and/or by considering the ApoE4 profile and Aβ1 42 concentration in CSF at baseline.
However, loss aversion promotes caution only when people are considering gains; once people have sustained losses, impulses change dramatically.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com