considered contributed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "considered contributed" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an incorrect combination of words and does not convey a clear meaning. Example: "The research findings were considered contributed by various experts in the field."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Wiki

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

In summarizing the weight of evidence in this review, we emphasized studies that we considered contributed most strongly to the weight of evidence; however, data from all 36 studies are presented in the Supplemental Material (see Supplemental Material, Tables S1 and S2).

Environmental Health Perspectives

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Of those, 187 are considered contributing properties to the historic district, and 22 are non-contributing.

Wikipedia

This can limit orthoses' capabilities and, if their users' needs are not adequately considered, contribute to their abandonment.

Medical Engineering & Physics

Bank of America, which considered contributing to the Remain campaign, but ultimately stayed neutral, according to news reports, said it was still assessing the fallout from the vote.

The Washington Post

All the proposals just considered contribute to our understanding of the various roles that agents can play in their own actions.

SEP

Several local businesses considered contributing money to the mountain's purchase.

Wikipedia

The memorial is included among the 187 buildings and structures considered contributing properties to the Sycamore Historic District.

Wikipedia

The district includes 226 properties over its 99 acre, of those, 187 are considered contributing members of the historic district.

Wikipedia

In addition to the 19th-century hospital, 26 other buildings dot the landscape, 22 of them considered "contributing" in the National Trust for Historic Preservation's register.

Huffington Post

Eckles said the city has considered contributing an as-yet-undetermined share through the sale of municipal bonds and other sources.

Los Angeles Times

The cost of owning a car and tougher standards to pass the test are considered contributing factors, but transport blogger Matt Lowrie said the decline is also part of a global trend.

Vice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "considered contributed" in formal writing. Opt for clearer and more grammatically correct alternatives such as "deemed to have contributed" or "regarded as a contributing factor".

Common error

A common mistake is to combine "considered" directly with "contributed" without a proper linking verb or preposition. Ensure the sentence structure clearly indicates what is doing the considering and what is being contributed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "considered contributed" is an attempt to link the act of considering with a past action of contributing. However, its grammatical structure is flawed. According to Ludwig AI, this combination of words is not correct in standard written English, suggesting a need for restructuring to convey the intended meaning effectively.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

30%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Academia

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "considered contributed" is grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity in standard English. Ludwig AI suggests it's an incorrect combination of words and offers alternatives like "deemed to have contributed" or "regarded as a contributing factor". While examples can be found in science, news and wiki sources, it is best to avoid this phrase in formal writing. Opting for more precise and grammatically sound alternatives will improve clarity and credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

deemed to have contributed

Replaces "considered contributed" with a more grammatically correct structure, specifying that something was judged to have made a contribution.

regarded as having contributed

Similar to "deemed to have contributed", this emphasizes the act of regarding something as a contribution.

believed to contribute

Shifts the focus to the belief that something is capable of contributing, rather than a past contribution.

thought to contribute

Similar to "believed to contribute", indicating an opinion or thought about something's potential contribution.

seen as a contributing factor

Emphasizes the role of something as one of several factors that contribute to a larger outcome.

understood to have contributed

Implies a general understanding that something has made a contribution.

assumed to have contributed

Suggests that a contribution was assumed, possibly without concrete evidence.

determined to have contributed

Indicates that a determination was made, usually through investigation or analysis, that something contributed.

assessed as contributing

Highlights the assessment process in determining the contribution.

recognized as contributing

Focuses on the act of recognizing or acknowledging the contribution.

FAQs

What is a more grammatically correct way to phrase "considered contributed"?

Instead of "considered contributed", you can use phrases like "deemed to have contributed", "regarded as having contributed", or "seen as a contributing factor", depending on the intended meaning.

Is "considered contributed" acceptable in formal writing?

No, "considered contributed" is not typically considered acceptable in formal writing due to its awkward phrasing. It is better to use more precise and grammatically correct alternatives.

How can I use "contribute" correctly in a sentence after "considered"?

After "considered", use a phrase that includes a linking verb such as "considered to have contributed", or rephrase the sentence to use "considered" in a different way, like "considered a contributing factor".

What's the difference between "considered contributed" and "deemed to have contributed"?

"Considered contributed" is grammatically incorrect. "Deemed to have contributed" is a correct alternative which means something was officially regarded or judged to have made a contribution.