Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
considered as substantial
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "considered as substantial" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct form would be "considered substantial" without the "as." Example: "The evidence presented in the report is considered substantial enough to warrant further investigation."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
13 human-written examples
PNO was considered as substantial if drainage was needed.
Science
An I value >50% was considered as substantial heterogeneity.
Science
A Cohen's kappa coefficient >0.6 was considered as substantial agreement.
Science
A value >50% is considered as substantial heterogeneity.
Science
For this review a value greater than 50% was considered as substantial heterogeneity[ 22].
Science
Both kappa coefficients were considered as substantial agreement between the observers.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
47 human-written examples
The Secretary considers as substantial compliance the issuance of minimum percentages of first level benefit appeal decisions within the periods of time specified in § 650.4.
Academia
They simply compute the indicator of intensity of change for each type of tools as the first difference between these two composite indicators.7 We discretize these indicators by considering as substantial changes that exceed about one standard deviation8 of their distribution.
Considered as a substantial form of a material body, the soul exists in a living being as the substantial form of an animal.
Science
However, getting a bound for the solution could be considered as a substantial step forward.
In view of the superior cut resistance behavior of woven composite fabric, it can be considered as the substantial choice for the sportswear, industrial and domestic applications.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When aiming for clarity and grammatical precision, omit "as" after "considered" and before "substantial". The correct form is "considered substantial."
Common error
Avoid using "as" between "considered" and the adjective. Saying "considered substantial" is more concise and grammatically sound than "considered as substantial".
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
2.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "considered as substantial" functions as a descriptive phrase, aiming to express that something is viewed as significant or considerable. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "considered as substantial" is grammatically questionable and should be avoided. While the individual words are appropriate for professional and academic contexts, the inclusion of "as" is considered redundant. Ludwig AI indicates that it is more correct to say just "considered substantial". Alternatives such as "deemed significant" or "regarded as considerable" may serve as suitable replacements. Always aim for conciseness and grammatical accuracy in your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
regarded as considerable
Replaces "considered" with "regarded" and "substantial" with "considerable", offering a slightly more formal tone.
deemed significant
Substitutes "considered as" with "deemed" and "substantial" with "significant", emphasizing importance.
viewed as important
Uses "viewed as" instead of "considered as" and "important" for "substantial", highlighting the perceived relevance.
seen as meaningful
Replaces "substantial" with "meaningful", shifting the focus to the value or impact.
judged as noteworthy
Employs "judged as" instead of "considered as" and "noteworthy" for "substantial", suggesting a formal assessment.
recognized as sizable
Substitutes "substantial" with "sizable", emphasizing the magnitude or extent.
perceived as large
Uses "perceived as" instead of "considered as" and "large" for "substantial", focusing on the subjective assessment of size.
estimated as significant
Emphasizes quantification, estimating its worth instead of just considering it.
accounted as major
Shifts focus to its role in a computation or accounting process.
accepted as remarkable
Highlights that its relevance is accepted and recognized
FAQs
How do I properly use the phrase "considered substantial" in a sentence?
The correct phrasing is without the "as": "considered substantial". For example, "The evidence was "considered substantial" enough to warrant further investigation."
What are some alternatives to saying "considered as substantial"?
You can use phrases like "deemed significant", "regarded as considerable", or "viewed as important" depending on the context.
Is it grammatically correct to say "considered as substantial"?
While the phrase might appear in some contexts, it's generally more grammatically sound to omit the "as" and simply say "considered substantial".
What's the difference between saying "considered substantial" and "considered as substantial"?
The phrase "considered substantial" is more direct and grammatically preferred. Adding "as" is often redundant and doesn't add any value. Omit "as" for more correct sentence structure.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
2.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested