Throffers form part of the wider moral and political considerations of coercion, and form part of the question of the possibility of coercive offers.
Instead, ethical considerations were present at the borders of coercion, particularly in relation to pressure and restrictions applied towards patients, especially those admitted voluntarily.
Some theorists argue that careful consideration of notions such as reciprocity, coercion, or fair terms of co-operation mandate that we give special weighting to the interests of compatriots.
Ethical considerations that are particularly pertinent include the risk of coercion of participants [ 4], and the potential for the blurring of role boundaries between researcher and participant [ 9].
Consideration of throffers forms part of the wider question of coercion and, specifically, the possibility of a coercive offer.
Lamond's claim about law's coerciveness stems from a number of considerations, but undoubtedly one is his understanding of the nature of coercion itself, which was discussed in Section 2.5 above.
According to Robert Audi, for example, "if religious considerations are not appropriately balanced with secular ones in matters of coercion, there is a special problem: a clash of Gods vying for social control.
However, informal coercion, such as psychological pressure involving persuasion or the threat of coercion more often gave rise to ethical considerations.
This work is worth consideration here, since their conclusions may impact how we understand the nature of coercion, and its place in law and politics.
The impact of coercion on treatment outcomes and the appropriateness of aftercare provision require further consideration.
