Sentence examples for consideration a fact from inspiring English sources

Lepore's analysis of the high homicide rate doesn't take into consideration a fact of American life: the legal doctrine known as "no duty to retreat".

To exercise knowledge-how, must an act be preceded by some implicit or explicit consideration of a fact about how to do it?

Taking into consideration the fact that an interruption of an antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel may cause severe thromboembolic complications and that all recorded bleeding incidents were easily manageable, continuation of clopidogrel treatment is recommended, unless a delay of the procedure is medically justifiable.

Taking into consideration the fact that a substantial proportion of migration in our setting occurs between the study area and Dar es Salaam, the biggest city in the country, we hypothesize that migrant household members may have a positive influence on facility delivery.

A big concern was getting a deal that took into consideration the fact that Muxtape wasn't a straightforward on-demand service, and should pay accordingly less than a service that was.

While introducing priorities, the operator should take into consideration the fact that an increase in the volume of traffic of the class with the highest priority will result in a decrease in the amount of resources available for calls of the remaining traffic classes.

Because no consensus exists on this matter, we opted to use the difference between systolic arterial pressure and RV systolic pressure, taking into consideration the fact that an important part of right coronary artery flow occurs during systole and that, in PHT, RV coronary artery flow is impaired proportionally to RV systolic pressures [ 48].

At its core, Wibidata is offering a platform that takes into consideration the fact that companies often have just a few seconds to engage their customers.

Terence Parsons (1993, 453 7) warns about drawing inferences about facts from considerations about the context '__ is a fact'.

You can interpret it quite negatively, and say that for 88% that was wasted money, but I don't actually see it that way, I think it has been misinterpreted in that sense". He said that for some of the 88%, the EMA payments would have "made no difference", but for others, finance would have been a consideration, and the fact that they would have stayed on showed "resilience".

Local relevance is not really a consideration beyond the fact that the disease-under-study is prevalent in the host community.