Sentence examples for considerably less variance from inspiring English sources

This was in fact observed, as randomized residual RMSD matrices showed considerably less variance (1.68×10−5 vs. 1.91×10−5, one-sample Z test, one-tailed p = 0.0334) and much lower average RMSD values (0.00028 vs. 0.00203, one sample Z test, one-tailed p<0.0001).

In contrast, the AUDIT-C, which only covers one domain, explained considerably less variance and had lower correlation to the AUDIT-10 than novel combinations, which was also observed in a previous computerised survey of young people [ 37].

Because the leading factors to be estimated are those that contain the most variance, any unestimable factors in our analysis should explain considerably less variance than those that have already been estimated and would thus contribute much less to a predicted response to selection than those that are included.

The number of experimental units to achieve a given power can be, and generally is, considerably less with pens because the variance among pens is generally less than the variance of cows within pens.

Methylation status at the other two highly associated AHRR residues, cg26703534 (adjusted R = 0.28, P < 0.0001) and cg21161138 (adjusted R = 0.19, P < 0.0001), was also highly correlated, although the proportion of the variance explained was considerably less.

Since the variance ratio of 0.35 is considerably less the critical value F 1,6,5%) = 5.99 the hypothesis of common c is accepted at the 5% level.

Despite this asymmetry being considerably less than 1.8 cm 56 and within normal variance and measurement error, 63 64 given the circumstances of the player's recurrent injury history, custom-made orthotics were prescribed to correct this asymmetry.

The variability of HbA1c values is also considerably less than that of FPG levels, with day-to-day within-person variance of <2% for HbA1c but 12 15% for FPG [22].

The variability of A1C values is also considerably less than that of FPG levels, with day-to-day within-person variance of <2% for A1C but 12 15% for FPG (45– 45).

The fourth and fifth principal components are considerably less important, explaining only 7.02 and 6.94% of the total variance, respectively.

The correlation was significant (p<0.001), but the regression accounted for only a small amount of the variance (r2 = 0.195) and the slope was considerably less than unity (0.18).