However, at high interaction strengths which inhibit the diffusivity considerably, clusters characterized by lower surface-to-volume ratio display lower diffusivities.
> -wrap-foot> Becalle all compared methods except the DBM method are not sensitive to location clustering of the variants, the power estimates of CMC, Price, MB, RB, SKAT and C-Alpha did not differ considerably in the clustered and non-clustered scenario.
Notably, the enrichment of paralogs within the clusters varied considerably, with clusters 5, 11-12, and 15 having the highest enrichment values (Table S3 in Additional file 1).
The only exceptions known so far are squamate reptiles, with the lizard Anolis carolinensis as a striking example of having accumulated a substantial number of retrotransposons in its Hox clusters, resulting in considerably larger cluster sizes [ 15, 16].
Both tables show that our signal transduction model based method generates considerably larger clusters, and the identified clusters by our method have at least 2 orders of magnitude higher P-value than the others on both function and localization categories.
Table 3 provides additional information on background characteristics of the participating individuals.> > Even though a single SLP led implementation in all clusters, strength of community mobilization varied considerably across clusters.
The size of the copper oxide or nickel oxide varies considerably from clusters to a crystallized material, depending on the x value and on the experimental conditions.
The proportion of cases representing recent TB transmission varied considerably by cluster definitions based on geopolitical borders.
The second equally large cluster had low Aβ42/P-tau quota and high NFL (that is, for concomitant AD and subcortical pathology), whereas the third, considerably smaller cluster had the highest levels of NFL and intermediate Aβ42/P-tau quota, suggesting predominant subcortical pathology or other reasons for NFL leakage.
Apo from both irrigation treatments clustered closely and showed considerably less variation in PC1 than IR64.
These mechanisms differ considerably; the Random susceptibility is not clustered in households by an explicit mechanism, while the Household mechanism strongly clusters susceptibility.
