Sentence examples for conservative size from inspiring English sources

What follows instead is the baroquely dark-hearted back story of why Jerry Chiffon -- the gayer-than-gay pride of Branch Creek's matron set, their own "Queer Eye" arbiter of style and taste -- donned a conservative size 16 pantsuit and took some poorly aimed potshots at a homophobic senator.

In principles, we may have inferred a conservative size for the pangenome of an isolate, and genome size of individual nuclei within such isolate may still vary.

A similar scenario has been argued by Sears [ 40] with respect to the origin of bat wings, explaining the conservative size relationship of digits across bat species, as well as the lack of fossil intermediates of bat wings, with a localized change in bmp expression patterns.

Local damage models would lead to overly conservative sizing.

The charge-reversing E650R mutation caused a slight left-shift of the dose response curve of cadmium activation, in contrast to the right-shift observed with the more conservative size-preserving E650Q mutation, further supporting the notion that this residue does not directly coordinate metal ions but rather works downstream of metal ion binding for channel activation.

Ideally, the study would have included a sample of 60 practices, but only 52 practices had calls conducted; however, as 69% of calls were correctly immediately referred for treatment, rather than the conservative sample size calculation estimate of 50%, this smaller sample size has not affected the expected accuracy level of ±4%.

The power for the within-group contrasts were estimated based on a conservative effect size of d = 0.80, and the sample sizes in each group were regarded as sufficient to detect a within-group effect of this size.

For our preferred calculations of an incident rate ratio (IRR) of 0.7 (based on a somewhat conservative effect size from the aforementioned pilot study), we find that a sample size of 300 cases and 300 controls will yield a power of approximately 0.90.

Large sample sizes are generally desirable in confirmatory factor analysis and the conservative sample size of the current study may have contributed to the absence of differences in model fit between the best-fit two and three-factor models.

Assuming a conservative effect size difference between stepped care and minimal intervention of the order of 0.3 would require a sample size of 175 participants in each of the two randomised groups, using power at 80% and a 5% significance level.

This is actually a surprising result since approximations typically call for a more conservative step size.