Sentence examples for conservative prevalence from inspiring English sources

Sample size was determined for key objectives based on the most conservative prevalence estimate of 50%%; calculations assumed 80%% power and a design effect of 2.0.

A 2003 review of epidemiological studies of children found autism prevalence rates ranging from 0.03 to 4.84 per 1,000, with the ratio of autism to Asperger syndrome ranging from 1.5 1 to 16:1; combining the geometric mean ratio of 5 1 with a conservative prevalence estimate for autism of 1.3 per 1,000 suggests indirectly that the prevalence of AS might be around 0.26 per 1,000.

A conservative prevalence estimate of psychiatric disorders in the Norwegian child and adolescent population (3-18 years old) is about 8% based on epidemiological surveys [ 1].

In order to produce conservative prevalence estimates and corresponding 95% CIs, studies reporting zero for the number of positives were imputed as being 0.5.

Considering a conservative prevalence estimate for schizophrenia of 8 per 1000, the registries can be expected to contain data on many survivors with coincident schizophrenia at the time of transplant.

24 A conservative prevalence estimate of 50% was used in these sample size calculations, since a priori data do not exist for appropriate care delivered in Australian children as a national estimate.

At the same level of power, this sample size was calculated as allowing the detection of a 0.3 SD group difference between participants with and without case-level depression at baseline, assuming a more conservative 13% prevalence.

At the same level of power, this sample size was calculated as allowing the detection of a 0.3 standard deviation group difference between participants with and without case-level depression at baseline, assuming a more conservative 13% prevalence.

Assuming a conservative background prevalence of 10% for depression among men attending general practice, a sample size of 1400 respondents from 14 to 16 practices would have 88% power to detect a 15 percentage point difference between men who have experienced or perpetrated negative behaviours, and men who have not done so with regard to any demographic or health measure.

For a conservative TB prevalence estimate of 0.25% extrapolated from the WHO report [ 18], a margin of error of 0.1% at 95% confidence interval (CI), a design effect of 2, and non-response rate of 10%, the required sample size was calculated as 9,359 persons.

According to conservative estimates, its prevalence is around 3 5% [ 1].