Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(55)
For example, consider that C 1, C 2, C 3 and C 4 consists of 18, 20, 23 and 24 nodes (i.e. atoms other than hydrogen atoms), respectively, and the pair ' C 1– C 2' conserve 18 nodes, the conservation ratio of the step ' C 1 – C 2' is 18/18 = 1.0 and that of ' C 2 – C 1' is 18/20 = 0.9, respectively.
When the adjacently located ortholog pairs are conserved across many genomes, the conservation ratio is close to one.
When the 17 nodes from the conserved nodes in ' C 2 – C 1' are conserved in ' C 1– C 3', the conservation ratio of the step ' C 2– C 1– C 3' is 17/20 = 0.85.
Currently, the τ parameter, representing a lower bound on their conservation ratio (in terms of the ratio of conserved and non-conserved exons) is used to regulate the clusters.
The performance of the proposed approach is witnessed by analyzing the parameters like packet delivery ratio, throughput, delay and energy conservation ratio.
To determine if the conservation ratio is the same for motif modes of the same topology, we calculated the conservation ratio for one million motif modes.
Similar(5)
The list was sorted in descending order, since the highest values for the conservation ratios indicate the proteins that are conserved to a higher degree among AM-competent species than between AM-competent and non-mycorrhizal species.
16 proteins exhibited a value >100 for both conservation ratios (Additional file 14: Table S6b), i.e. they are highly conserved among both, AM-competent dicots and monocots, relative to the non-mycorrhizal species.
In addition, a further 272 proteins exhibited conservation ratios of >100, indicative of a high degree of AM-related conservation.
Conservation ratios were plotted along divergence times between species, according to the mammalian phylogeny in Ensembl v73.
Instead of a fixed threshold level, we defined the conservation ratios for a set of household proteins that do not exhibit an AM-related bias in conservation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com