Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
The transformations of force necessarily raised the question of the conservation of force.
His paper "On the Conservation of Force," which appeared in 1847, marked an epoch in both the history of physiology and the history of physics.
Such efforts are, at bottom, attempts to conceptually embody a law, as epitomized in Helmholtz' "The Conservation of Force: A Memoir" (Kahl 1977, pp. 49 50).
Leibniz is therefore able to argue that Descartes's laws of motion are untenable because they would lead to violations of the conservation of force as measured by mv2.
Helmholtz, who had formulated a conservation law ten years previously in "On the Conservation of Force," entered the field at this point.
Marshalling the Kantian antecedents of the argument, Hyder maintains that Helmholtz's response to criticisms of "On the Conservation of Force" by Clausius in 1954 influenced Helmholtz's later work on geometry.
Similar(51)
From these two considerations were to come powerful arguments, first, for the transformations and conservation of forces and, second, for field theory as a representation of reality.
The scientific doctrine of the conservation of vital forces meant that all energies expended on mental activity drained those available for animal functions.
For intermediate values of Δ (sufficiently large that the conservation law does not hold, but sufficiently small that the numerical orbits are not chaotic) a new "super-adiabatic" invariant Δ is derived, and it is shown that conservation of Δ forces the numerical orbits to lie on smooth closed curves.
Leibniz therefore insists, "when the parts of the bodies absorb the force of the impact, as a whole, as when two pieces of rich earth or clay come into collision … when, I say, some force is absorbed by the parts, it is as good as lost … But this loss … does not detract from the inviolable truth of the law of the conservation of the same force in the world.
The results of our study and these future areas of research will add to the military's medical capabilities, ultimately resulting in conservation of the fighting force.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com