Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(26)
Now from Proposition 2.10, λ is the unique positive root of (p z) ); consequently it follows from the first part of the Perron-Frobenius theorem (Theorem 2.5) that (rho(mathbf {C})=lambda) and the conclusion of the first part of the lemma follows immediately.
Consequently, it follows from (2.3) and (2.4) that (2.5).
Consequently, it follows from (2.10) and condition (iii) that (2.23).
Consequently, it follows from (3.5) that x n i j → u.
Moreover, by Remark 5.1, we have and Consequently, It follows from the strongly relative nonexpansiveness that This completes the proof.
Consequently, it follows from Lemma 1 that F 1 and F 2 form a pair of distinguishable restrictive fault sets.
Similar(34)
Since μ/α → 0 as α → 0 (and consequently, h/α → 0), it follows from (19) and the last inequality that the set are bounded.
It follows consequently that the nonsynonymous-to-synonymous rates ratio (ω = dN/ dS) can be considered as a stringent measure of selection [ 75, 76].
The latter result illustrates the role of runoff in shaping the flow paths it follows and, consequently, in lessening the surface storage capacity.
Taking into account that tan = tan α − tan β 1 + tan α ⋅ tan β. and since α, β ∈ [ 0, π 2 ), we have that tan α, tan β ∈ [ 0, ∞ ), and consequently, from the last inequality it follows that tan ≤ tan α − tan β.
It consequently follows that mechanical forces may be immunomodulatory.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com