Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Consequently, in virtue of Lemma 1.1 we find that C λ has another fixed point x λ, 2 with x λ, 2 ∈ { K ¯ 2 − K 1, as (H5) holds, K ¯ 2 ′ − K 1, as (H6) holds.
Consequently, in virtue of the weak closeness of (H^{1}_{0}(Omega_{gamma}backslashoverline{omega}_{t^)^{2}times H^{2}_{0}(Omega_{gamma}backslashoverline{omega}_{t^)) we have ((tilde{eta}-{eta})in H^{1}_{0}(Omega_{gamma}backslashoverline{omega}_{t^)^{2}times H^{2}_{0}(Omega_{gamma}backslashoverline{omega}_{t^)).
Similar(58)
In virtue of what, precisely, would you distinguish them aesthetically?
In virtue of Eqs.
Then, in virtue of the continuity of, we see that.
or, in virtue of the definition of, (3.11).
In virtue of Lemma 2.5, there exists such that.
In virtue of Lemma 3.1, there exists such that (3.12).
Note that in virtue of Lemma 2.3 and (3.22).
And thus not in virtue of the satisfaction of (ii*).
In virtue of what does the right obtain?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com