The phrase "consequential damage" is grammatically correct and commonly used in written English.
"Consequential damage" refers to the indirect or secondary harm that results from an event or action. It is often used in legal or insurance contexts to describe the effects of an event. Example: The company's failure to properly maintain their equipment resulted in consequential damage to neighboring properties when a fire broke out.
"We had a fire at home about 18 months ago and fortunately we didn't have any consequential damage, but it all came into perspective for me.
GCHQ gave parliament's intelligence and security committee a number of case studies that the committee said could not be published – even in redacted form – without significant risk to GCHQ's capabilities and consequential damage to the national security of the UK.
The cost, to the sufferers alone, is between $1.4 billion and $4 billion a year and that does not take account of consequential damage to the economies of the countries they live in.
None, therefore, were effective in preventing or limiting the consequential damage.
Consequently, rutin has been a powerful hepatoprotective effect to combat hepatic encephalopathy associated hyperammonemia and its consequential damage in liver and brain.
In a regular design the Hafencity area would be closed off by a levee to protect the precinct behind it, creating a vulnerable, fragile situation, because in the instance the protection fails, the consequential damage is huge.
It is also possible the banks would be required to pay consequential damages – the lost profits of the private equity firms from not making this acquisition.
A Flint-based lawyer who filed a $150m lawsuit this month, seeking full water bill refunds for residents, said there are "consequential damages" for being provided unusable water.
Some settlements also involved "consequential damages" — extra money awarded to cover investors' costs or opportunities they missed because they didn't have access to their funds.
The new law makes a claimant's route to the courthouse trickier and requires a higher evidentiary standard to receive double or consequential damages from a lawsuit.
The court sided with the trust, saying "that the buyer made no attempt to participate in the auction and bid on the painting" and that failure to do so "constitutes a failure to mitigate its alleged consequential damages".
