After the in-flight explosion of the U.S. space shuttle orbiter Columbia in February 2003 and the consequent grounding of the shuttle fleet, Soyuz spacecraft for a time provided the only means for ISS crew exchanges until shuttle flights resumed in July 2005.
The most severe damage to buildings and infrastructure was often associated with lateral spreading and consequent large ground distortion and permanent ground displacements.
After the catastrophic explosion of the shuttle orbiter Columbia in 2003 and the consequent temporary grounding of the shuttle fleet, activity aboard the ISS was reduced virtually to a caretaker level, while Soyuz spacecraft provided the sole means for station crew exchanges.
Ground pattern of Phyllocarida.
Another possible argument that has been proposed by C. S. Lewis is the Argument from Reason: if, as monism implies, all of our thoughts are the effects of physical causes, then we have no reason for assuming that they are also the consequent of a reasonable ground.
Kant begins with the purely logical relation between ground and consequent.
The analysis of a finite space into points is no more objective than the analysis (say) of causality into time-sequence + ground and consequent, or of equality into sameness of relation to a given magnitude.
Just as Kant had earlier emphasized (in these pre-critical works) that the consequent of a real ground is not contained in it, and thus does not result by "the analysis of concepts," Kant now (in the critical period) maintains that the concept of the effect cannot be contained in the concept of the cause and, accordingly, that a judgment relating the two cannot be analytic.
Knowledge, however, is apprehended by reasoning from ground to consequent.
The fundamental problem with the relationship between a real ground and its consequent, therefore, is that the consequent is not identical with either the ground or a part of this concept i.e., it is not "contained in [the ground] by the analysis of concepts".
