These findings also provide no support for the suggestion that psychopathology in 22q11.2DS is a non-specific consequence of intellectual impairment reflecting mechanisms that differ from those operating in more typical cases.
What was wrong, instead, were three consequences of that intellectual divide that reflect very badly on the profession.
The disintegration of individual symbols and the change in the emphasis on the role of symbolism in general are partly consequences of cultural, intellectual, social, and economic transformations.
So how did we get to this situation where key scientific and regulatory bodies are belatedly realising the consequences of extending intellectual property monopoly rights which can capture products of nature such as gene sequences?
Because of his unusually independent personal circumstances, Goethe was able to live through the consequences of the intellectual revolution as a free man, with no traditional religious or social attachments.
The consequences of broader intellectual-property protections have at times been ridiculous.
If a child in this period of life develops iron-deficiency anaemia, the consequences for intellectual and physical development could last a lifetime.
If this were the case, it might be argued that psychopathology in 22q11.2DS is a non-specific consequence of generalised intellectual impairment.
A large portion of the fight against copyright violation derives its currency not from the fear of abuse of the works but from the claim that, should these practices be condoned, the financial consequences would render the continuation of intellectual production impossible or, at least, leave it impaired.
