consequences for

USAGE SUMMARY

"consequences for" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
It is used to connect two parts of a sentence. For example: "The student was warned that there would be serious consequences for cheating on the exam."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

There's consequences for poverty.

The New York Times - Magazine

Both have consequences for education.

The New York Times

There were consequences for him.

The New York Times

Consequences for U.S. foreign policy?

The New York Times

There are also consequences for keeping quiet.

The New York Times

The consequences for these youths are severe.

The New York Times

This may have big consequences for politics.

The Economist

That may have grim consequences for Argentina.

The Economist

This pattern has real consequences for teenagers.

The New York Times

"There are consequences for violating the law".

The New York Times

This could have consequences for the coalition.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing "consequences for", be specific about who or what is affected. Clearly state the entity experiencing the consequences to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid vague statements about "consequences for" without specifying the area or individual affected. Instead of saying 'There will be consequences', clarify 'There will be consequences for the budget' or 'There will be consequences for the team's performance'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "consequences for" serves as a prepositional phrase, indicating the entity or area that will experience the result or effect of a particular action or situation. According to Ludwig, it is a valid grammatical construct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

59%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Social Media

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "consequences for" is a widely used and grammatically correct prepositional phrase that connects actions or events to their resulting impacts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for various contexts, from formal reports to news articles. When using this phrase, clarity is key; always specify who or what is affected to avoid ambiguity. While alternatives like "effects on" or ""ramifications of"" exist, the choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

effects on

Directly addresses the changes or impacts that something has on a particular subject.

impacts on

Similar to "effects on" but often suggests a more significant or forceful influence.

ramifications of

Focuses specifically on the broader, often unintended, effects that spread out from an action.

implications of

Highlights the potential future outcomes or effects that stem from a decision or action.

repercussions of

Often used to describe the negative or undesirable effects that follow an action.

results in

Emphasizes the direct outcomes or conclusions that follow from a process or event.

outcomes of

Like "results in", but may encompass a broader range of effects, both intended and unintended.

fallout from

Suggests the negative and often unexpected consequences that arise after an event.

aftermath of

Emphasizes the period and conditions directly following an event, especially a negative one.

sequelae to

A more formal term, primarily used in medical or scientific contexts, to denote conditions that result from a disease or injury.

FAQs

How can I use "consequences for" in a sentence?

Use "consequences for" to link an action or event to its resulting impact. For example, "There are significant "ramifications of" not adhering to safety protocols".

What are some alternatives to "consequences for"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "effects on", "impacts on", or ""ramifications of"".

Is it better to use "consequences for" or "implications of"?

Both are valid, but "consequences for" often refers to direct results, while "implications of" suggests potential future outcomes or broader effects.

What is the difference between "consequences for" and "repercussions of"?

"Consequences for" is a general term for results, while "repercussions of" often implies negative or undesirable outcomes.