consequence to

USAGE SUMMARY

"consequence to" is not correct or usable in written English.
You would use the phrase "consequence of" in a sentence. For example: The consequence of the increased workload was higher levels of stress.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

That's the consequence to me".

The New Yorker

Football's of vital consequence to me.

Independent

Curiously, there seems to be no consequence to this "problem".

The New York Times - Health

That is of little consequence to Mr. Lobe, 57.

The New York Times

This occurs because there has been no consequence to this behavior.

The Guardian - Opinion

A senator can be wrong for 20 years, without consequence to the nation.

The New York Times

Unfortunately, what players root for bears little consequence to what they'll sign for.

The New York Times - Sports

I may be wrong, but I really do think there is a consequence to this.

The New Yorker

Yet the consequence to Israel of either of them emerging triumphant is unclear.

The New York Times

Finally, there is a psychological consequence to labeling the president an incurious frat boy.

The New York Times

"I defy anyone to debate me on any issue of consequence to New York".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing results, consider using stronger verbs or nouns that directly express the outcome, instead of relying solely on "consequence of" for varied and impactful writing.

Common error

The common error is using "consequence to" instead of the grammatically correct "consequence of". This mistake undermines the professional tone of the writing. Always double-check the preposition to ensure accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "consequence to" functions as a prepositional phrase, incorrectly modifying a noun by attempting to link it to a result or outcome. According to Ludwig AI, the phrasing is not correct in English, and the proper use should be "consequence of."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Academia

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "consequence to" appears frequently across various sources, Ludwig AI analysis confirms that it is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "consequence of". Despite its prevalence in diverse contexts like news, media, and scientific articles, writers should avoid "consequence to" to maintain credibility and accuracy. Instead, alternatives such as "result of", "outcome of", or "impact of" are recommended to express cause-and-effect relationships effectively and correctly. Remember to prioritize grammatical correctness in your writing to ensure clear and professional communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Result of

Indicates direct outcomes or effects from a specific action or event.

Effect of

Denotes the direct impact or change produced by a cause.

Aftermath of

Refers to the period following a significant event, especially a destructive or harmful one.

Outcome of

Describes the final result or effect of an activity or process.

Impact of

Emphasizes the forceful or significant influence of one thing on another.

Ramifications of

Highlights the complex and often unforeseen consequences of a decision or action.

Implications of

Focuses on the potential long-term effects or suggestions that can be inferred from a situation or event.

Reaction to

Specifies a response, either emotional or active, to a particular event or stimulus.

Response to

Similar to "reaction to", but often implies a more considered or planned action.

Follow-up to

Suggests an action or event that comes directly after and is related to a preceding one.

FAQs

How do I properly use the word "consequence" in a sentence?

The correct phrase is "consequence of", not "consequence to". For example, "The "consequence of" the action was unexpected".

What are some alternatives to saying "consequence of"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "result of", "outcome of", "effect of", or "impact of".

Is "consequence to" ever correct in English?

No, "consequence to" is not grammatically correct in standard English. The correct preposition to use with "consequence" is "of".

What's the difference between ""consequence of"" and "result of"?

While both phrases indicate an outcome, "consequence of" often implies a more significant or far-reaching effect than "result of". The "consequence of" something can be more complex and impactful than just the result of it.