The notion that stagnation is the necessary consequence of deficits and debt inherited from a profligate Labour government is nonsense akin to the Tea Party-led hysteria in the US, yet this view dominates the debate in Britain.
Gernsbacher and Pripas-Kapit [ 16] argue that the deficits in pragmatic language which are found in autism could also be a consequence of deficits in general language comprehension rather than of specific pragmatic impairments.
Before 1974, it was plausible to argue that there was some virtue in having a debt limit because it forced Congress to acknowledge the consequences of deficit spending from time to time.
Re "It's Even Worse Than You Think," by Howell E. Jackson (Op-Ed, Oct. 9): The government's accounting practices are so perilous that the media have an obligation to educate the public, most of whom do not understand the consequences of deficit spending.
Paul Solman has a post on Greg Mankiw's attempt at a gotcha over my views circa 2003 on the consequences of deficits.
We seek to expand the discussion on the unintended consequences of deficit-centered scholarship by arguing that health research should also engage with the narratives of hope and desire that are reflective of the way many Native youth feel about their communities.
Our data, not only show similar decrease in respiration, but also pointed out the downstream deleterious consequence of this deficit, such as decrease in ATP synthesis rate, proteasomal deficit, and α-synuclein accumulation.
But I show these because it's an important consequence of the deficit.
These occur in consequence of a deficit (or surplus), actual or anticipated.
