Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
As a consequence, no angel is one in number in the strict sense of the term (as being one in number necessarily implies the actual presence of a multiplicity of things of the same species), even though broadly speaking every angel is one in number, as two (or more) angels are, after all, "many things"—but never many angels of the same kind (SN, part VI, chap. 5, fol. 95vb).
Similar(59)
"No angel bothers to lift me from earth".
Watch "No Angel" below. .
By practical consequences, no.
Argentina is no angel.
Bilic is no angel.
No angel has been forthcoming.
He was certainly no angel.
No angel food cake.
Keats was no angel.
No angel at the door.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com