Sentence examples for consequence approach from inspiring English sources

The relevant consequence approach faces three major hurdles.

According to the consequence approach, Popper was right in thinking that truthlikeness depends on the relative sizes of classes of true and false consequences, but erred in thinking that all consequences of a theory count the same.

While a multitude of apparently different solutions to the problem have been proposed, they can be classified them into three main approaches, each with its own heuristic — the content approach, the consequence approach and the likeness approach.

Others, however, have used the relevant consequence approach to avoid the trivialization results that plague the content approach, and capture quite a few of the basic intuitive judgments of truthlikeness.

The first two, the content approach (§1.2) and the consequence approach (§1.3), were both initiated by Popper in his ground-breaking work and both deliver what he regarded as an essential desideratum for any theory of truthlikeness — what we will call the value of content for truths.

There are the political fixes, of course, ranging from President Obama's "universal mandate, universal insurance" agenda, to presidential hopeful Ron Paul's "personal choice, personal consequence" approach, along with a dozen other proposals for everything from single-payer to total laissez-faire.

Although Popper's specific proposals did not capture the intuitive concept, the content and consequence approaches are still being actively developed and refined.

This considered position was dismissed as typical AU waffle, but it now looks a whole lot more sensible than the bomb-them-and-to-hell-with-the-consequences approach.

Another problem is that whatever the threshold, as the dire consequences approach it, counter-intuitive results appear to follow.

The law requires many of the known best practices in bullying prevention policies, including enumeration without being limited, a thorough reporting procedure, and flexibility in its consequences approach.

Most convincing approaches, according to the interviewed opinion leaders, were the health consequences approach, and the religious expert, i.e. that the practice is not a religious requirement.