Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(52)
A growing scientific consensus states that the global climate is changing and that human activity is responsible for these changes.
Rigorous proof shows that the systems output can reach synchronization in a finite time and the final consensus states are the leader׳s states.
An article alongside (Nuclear theory: the current consensus) states that "a single dose below 100 millisieverts (mSv) is usually considered safe", and later gives Allison's claim that "there is a threshold of about 200 mSv, below which the body can repair all DNA damage caused and, therefore, which is safe".
In so doing, we obtain a SDQNR for each sensor and each independent trial and so Fig. 4 shows the distribution of SDQNRs of the quantized consensus states for a range of q-bit uniform quantizers using a box plot.
The consensus states "With a weaker ending, Unbreakable is not as a good as The Sixth Sense.
The consensus states "Anchored by another winning performance from Hanks, Spielberg's unflinchingly realistic war film virtually redefines the genre".
Similar(8)
Without loss of generality, assume that the state g1 is the consensus state and the states g2, g3, g4 are equiprobable non-consensus states.
One somewhat non-obvious feature of this model is the existence of a combination of the rate of transition between non-consensus states μ and the rate of transition from the consensus state λ, for which the conservation of the consensus nucleotide in a sequence alignment can be lower than the conservation of a neutral (non-consensus) nucleotide.
In this case we have two groups of M consensus and N non-consensus states.
Next, compare the probabilities of conservation of the consensus and non-consensus states P cc and P nn.
From the practical point of view, these cases are not very interesting, since the events of transition between different non-consensus states can be hardly observed on practice.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com