consensus quality for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "consensus quality for" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts discussing the quality of consensus in decision-making or evaluations, but it requires additional context for clarity. Example: "The team needs to assess the consensus quality for the proposed solutions before moving forward."

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The SNP filtering was performed using the default parameters except for the minimum consensus quality for SNPs (-q 40).

DNA Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

We attempted a variety of filtering schemes for SNP-calling, incorporating thresholds for consensus base quality, mapping quality of supporting reads, and consensus quality of adjacent bases.

BMC Genomics

Further basic statistics like the total read depth for each position, consensus quality, allele frequency and genotype quality for the variant in one sample were computed by SAMtools (Sequence Alignment/Map) and BCFtools from the SAMtools package [ 54].

BMC Genomics

The score for consensus quality, which is an index of the depth and accuracy of the flanking sequences identified by MAQ, was set at >30 for SNP identification.

BMC Genomics

Coverage of ≥8× and a consensus quality score ≥20 was observed for 96%, 94% and 94% of target bases in the nuclear genome.

Genome Medicine

Moreover, we introduce a new metric to examine annotator quality, which can be used for finding good annotators to enhance consensus quality and reduce crowd labeling costs.

Neurocomputing

The main goal of this research is to investigate an effective methodology for collaborative ontology building in which we apply consensus quality and susceptible to consensus to reach to the final version of the collaborative ontology building.

Vietnam Journal of Computer Science

In a nutshell, significant performance improvement for most PTM types could be achieved in the AMS 4.0 software using the designed consensus strategy, without losing quality for the others, giving added value to the existing AMS 3.0 prediction software.

Amino Acids

There have been earlier attempts to identify optimum outcome measures for research (Deyo et al. 1998, 2014), but this is the first to search for an international consensus on quality measures for use in daily clinical practice.

Acta Orthopaedica

This method is a slight variation of the one used by MIRA [ 5] to calculate the quality for a consensus position.

BMC Genomics

The haploid extracted sample shows a moderately increased error rate at high coverage values, but our overall estimate of Q is still well above what is considered high quality for a consensus sequence.

Genetics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "consensus quality for", ensure the context clearly defines what 'quality' is being evaluated in relation to the consensus. Specify if you are referring to the quality of the decision-making process, the data used, or the outcome.

Common error

Avoid using "consensus quality for" without specifying the type of quality you are referring to. Generic use can lead to ambiguity. Instead, clarify with specifics like "consensus on data quality for" or "consensus on process quality for".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "consensus quality for" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or noun phrase, specifying the quality of something based on consensus. Ludwig indicates this phrase isn't standard, emphasizing the need for clear context when used.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "consensus quality for" is a phrase used to express the quality of something based on agreed-upon standards. Ludwig's analysis suggests the phrase isn't standard English, needing careful contextualization. The phrase appears mainly in scientific contexts. Related phrases like ""quality of consensus on"" and "agreed-upon quality metrics for" provide alternative ways to convey similar meanings, often with increased clarity. When writing, specify clearly what aspect of quality is being evaluated to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

quality of consensus on

Reverses the structure, emphasizing the quality inherent in the consensus itself.

consensus-based quality of

Shifts focus to quality derived from a consensus-driven process.

quality standards for consensus

Changes to standards that are created by consensus.

quality of agreement on

Replaces "consensus" with a similar term, "agreement", maintaining the focus on quality.

agreed-upon quality metrics for

Highlights metrics defined through consensus.

quality criteria for consensus

Focuses specifically on the criteria used to determine the quality of a consensus.

reliability of consensus in

Replaces quality with the term reliability.

degree of consensus on quality

Focuses on the extent of agreement regarding quality.

level of agreement regarding quality for

Expresses the extent of consensus using different wording.

strength of consensus on the quality of

Emphasizes the robustness or solidity of the consensus.

FAQs

How can I use "consensus quality for" in a sentence?

You might use "consensus quality for" when discussing the agreed-upon standards or metrics used to evaluate something. For instance: "The team needs to assess the "quality of consensus on" the proposed solutions before moving forward."

What does "consensus quality for" actually mean?

It refers to the level of agreement achieved regarding the quality of something. This could be the quality of data, a process, or a decision. It's important to define what 'quality' means in the specific context.

Which is more appropriate, "consensus quality for" or ""quality of consensus on""?

While both are acceptable, ""quality of consensus on"" is often clearer because it directly indicates that you're evaluating the quality of the consensus itself. "Consensus quality for" requires more context to understand what aspect of quality is being assessed.

What are some examples of what "consensus quality for" might apply to?

It can apply to various domains. For example, in research, it might refer to "agreed-upon quality metrics for a study's design". In software development, it could relate to "quality standards for consensus in code reviews".