Sentence examples for consensus coefficient from inspiring English sources
A weighted (corrected) consensus coefficient was generated for each substance to reflect (1) agreement with the original label, and (2) distribution among raters' labels.
The ratings showed little variance with a corrected consensus coefficient of >0.8 in all but four cases which had to be re-rated in the second round.
The resulting percentages were then weighted to generate a corrected consensus coefficient (cons_corr, definition see ESM 1, FORTA list, p. 41) for each item reflecting the degrees of deviation between the experts' individual FORTA ratings.
In brief, the aggregated list of rater labels was statistically analysed (see below), the aggregate findings were sent out to the reviewers for a second rating round if the consensus coefficient was <0.800.
These 12 items correlated directly with the substances receiving the lowest corrected consensus coefficients.
However, consensus on the coefficients of variation that need to be used on the resistance and load effects, is still missing, which significantly affects the results for the required proof load magnitudes.
The amalgamated best fit consensus scoring function showed coefficient of determination (0.891), leave one out cross validated squared correlation coefficient (0.776) and external predictivity value (0.668).
It is well known from the stochastic approximation literature [36] that, in order to ensure asymptotic convergence to consensus subspace, the weight coefficient γ(j) must satisfy the persistence condition as follows γ ( j ) > 0, ∑ j = 0 ∞ γ ( j ) = ∞, ∑ j = 0 ∞ γ ( j ) 2 < ∞. (9).
The interobserver variability was evaluated for the annotations in unmixed and white light images separately, also by computing Dice coefficients, where consensus annotations were obtained by majority voting over the observers.
The correlation coefficient between NIH consensus criteria and tumor size was 0.78, and that between NIH consensus criteria and mitosis was 0.71 (Suppl. Table S9).
Concordance between the EPAGE-II score assessed by the first reviewer and the final score obtained by consensus, presented an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.704 (moderate-good), and a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient of 0.651.
