Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

conquered by

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"conquered by" is a valid part of a sentence in written English.
You can use it to describe a situation in which one entity has been defeated, subdued, or otherwise overtaken by another. For example, "The hill was once a fiercely contested battleground, but the opposing forces were eventually conquered by the invading army."

✓ Grammatically correct

Encyclopedias

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

ASIA IS A land never conquered by institutional shareholders.

News & Media

The Economist

Estonia was conquered by 1227 and Courland by 1263.

In 1513 Katsina was conquered by the Songhai.

It was conquered by the Muslim Mamlūks in 1375.

It was conquered by Alexander the Great c. 330 bc.

Others were long ago conquered by weeds and tall grass.

News & Media

The New York Times

The republic was finally conquered by Napoleon in 1806.

His addiction had been conquered by his addiction to power.

It was conquered by the Turks in 1460.

Lebanon could not be conquered by one side, nor divided among all.

News & Media

The Economist

South-east Asia's highest peak (4,095 metres) can be conquered by any reasonably fit person.

News & Media

Independent
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "conquered by" to clearly and concisely indicate that one entity has been overcome by another, whether in a military, political, or metaphorical sense.

Common error

Avoid using "conquered by" in active voice constructions. It's a passive construction, so ensure the subject is the entity being overcome, not the one doing the conquering. For example, don't say "The army conquered by the city;" instead, say "The city was conquered by the army."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "conquered by" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject has been overcome or defeated by an external force. Ludwig's examples demonstrate its use in describing historical events, personal struggles, and even abstract concepts being overcome.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Encyclopedias

26%

News & Media

39%

Science

9%

Less common in

Wiki

16%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "conquered by" is a common and grammatically correct passive voice phrase used to describe the act of being overcome or defeated. Ludwig AI confirms its validity in English writing. It appears most frequently in encyclopedias and news media, with a neutral to formal register. When using the phrase, remember to use it in passive voice, and ensure that the subject is the entity being overcome, not the one doing the conquering. Consider alternatives like "defeated by" or ""subdued by"" depending on the specific context. "Conquered by" carries a connotation of being overwhelmed or defeated, which is why the selection of this phrase must be attentively evaluated by writers.

FAQs

How is "conquered by" typically used in a sentence?

"Conquered by" is typically used in the passive voice to indicate that a place, group, or entity was defeated or taken over by another. For example, "The region was "subdued by" foreign invaders".

What are some alternatives to "conquered by"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "defeated by", "overcome by", "subjugated by", or "overpowered by".

Is it correct to say "conquered by" in all contexts?

While generally correct, the appropriateness depends on the specific context. Ensure the entity being "conquered" is actually being defeated or overtaken. In some cases, a different phrase might be more fitting. For example, if something is mildly influenced, phrases like "influenced by" might be better.

What's the difference between "conquered by" and "influenced by"?

"Conquered by" implies a forceful takeover or defeat, while "influenced by" suggests a more subtle effect or impact. Use "conquered by" when there's a clear sense of one entity overcoming another.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: