Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
Our results also show that the increase in perceptual load obtained by introducing irrelevant items during the presentation of colored shapes has no effect on the incidental conjunction of color.
In conclusion, our results suggest the occurrence of an incidental conjunction of color and shape.
The objective of this experiment was to verify the incidental conjunction of color and shape in the visual store.
In this experiment, we analyzed the influence of perceptual load in the incidental conjunction of color during the memorization of shape.
We investigated the process of the incidental conjunction of color and shape (Exp1) and its potential association with the selection of relevant information to the memory task (Exp2).
Ecker et al. (2013) conversely, found evidence of incidental conjunction of color and shape, but only in conditions in which the color was intrinsic to the memorized figure.
Similar(50)
Participants monitored for targets (low-load condition, "T" of either color; high-load condition, blue "Z" and white "N but not the opposite conjunctions of color and letter shape) within a stream of 20 successive letters randomly chosen from T, N, Z, M, L, K, and W and randomly colored blue or white (Arial, font size = 25; visual angle: 1°) and responded by pressing a button.
Participants monitored a central stream of crosses for targets defined on the basis of either a single feature (color) or a conjunction of features (color and orientation) and were simultaneously presented with irrelevant auditory distractors.
In our case, the symbols are the target items, which can be defined by a single feature (color) or a conjunction of two features (color and shape).
In previous studies, such as Stefurak and Boynton (1986), evidence of incidental conjunction of shape and color was not found when participants were instructed to memorize only one characteristic (color or shape of animals).
This asymmetry in the conjunction of shape and color deserves further investigation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com