Sentence examples for conifer table from inspiring English sources

In general, elk primarily used meadows and thinned conifer, cattle used meadows, and deer used burns and thinned conifer (Table 1).

In 2005, both elk and cattle use was significantly (P ≤ 0.008) greater in mountain meadows than in thinned conifer (Table 1).

Cattle and deer use of burns was generally similar to use of other sites whereas elk use of burns was generally lower than meadows or thinned conifer (Table 1).

In 2005, elk use did not differ (P > 0.621) among types, whereas cattle (P = 0.005) primarily used meadows and deer (P < 0.001) primarily used burns and thinned conifer (Table 1).

R2* ranged from 0.10 for Quercus ilex to 0.53 for other conifers (Table 4).

This trend extends to other conifers (Table S5) as well as to angiosperms, including C. sativus, A. thaliana, and P. trichocarpa.

The number of mapped markers in C. japonica was higher and the average interval between markers was smaller than those reported for other conifers (Table 2).

They are present in our data at a level an order of magnitude higher than in comparable EST collections for other plants, and two orders of magnitude higher than in other conifers (Table 4).

The majority of the annotated sequences corresponded to known plant proteins, with 9.8% matching conifer sequences (Table 3).

They have also been submitted to the TreeGenes database [ 35]. EST redundancy in the present study was 51%, which is lower than estimates of 59 to 85% reported in other representative conifer studies (Table  2), even though our ESTs were sequenced from a standard non-normalized cDNA library versus normalized cDNA libraries used in most of the other studies.

This is 15-fold higher than the average mutation rate found in conifer orthologues (see Table 1).