conflicts on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "conflicts on" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to conflicts regarding a specific topic or issue, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear. Example: "There are several conflicts on the proposed policy changes that need to be addressed."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

However, this situation started changing from the late eighties with increasing militarisation and conflicts on the one hand, and declining economic situation in the 1990s on the other.

Unicef

Pakistan now has conflicts on two of its borders.

The New York Times

The only stories here are about conflicts on the grassland.

The Guardian

Mr. Bush faces his own conflicts on the gun issue.

The New York Times

Given all the conflicts on the planet today, this is an understandable but grave mistake.

The New York Times

Pakistan is both vulnerable to the conflicts on its borders and guilty of stirring them up.

The Economist

You don't like to have any personality conflicts on the track in the position we're in".

The New York Times - Sports

Turkey has taken more than 2 million refugees from the conflicts on its borders.

The Guardian

The conversations and conflicts on the set ring true, while slyly satirising all the people involved.

The Guardian - Film

What would happen, she asks, if we didn't project our conflicts on to food?

The Guardian - Lifestyle

A dispute ensues, as difficult to adjudicate as some of the conflicts on "Law and Order".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing disagreements, specify the subject of the "conflicts" clearly using prepositions like "about", "over", or "regarding" for enhanced clarity. For example, instead of saying 'conflicts on policy', specify 'conflicts about policy' or 'conflicts regarding policy'.

Common error

Avoid using "on" imprecisely after "conflicts". While commonly used, it often leads to ambiguity. Replace "on" with more precise prepositions like "over", "about", or "regarding" to show the relationship between the conflict and its subject.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "conflicts on" functions as a noun phrase followed by a preposition. However, the preposition "on" is often considered vague in this context. Ludwig AI suggests that more specific prepositions may improve clarity.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

36%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

6%

Wiki

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "conflicts on" is commonly used, Ludwig AI analysis suggests it's often grammatically questionable and can lack clarity. Its usage spans various contexts, from news and media to scientific and formal business writing. Better alternatives exist, such as "conflicts about", "conflicts over", or "conflicts regarding", which provide greater precision. Although frequently found, careful consideration of preposition choice can significantly improve the quality and clarity of your writing when discussing disagreements. Ludwig's examples highlight both the commonality of the phrase and the potential for improvement.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

disagreements about

Uses the more general term "disagreements" to replace "conflicts", specifying the subject with "about".

disputes about

Replaces "conflicts" with "disputes" focusing on disagreements, and "on" with "about" to indicate the subject of the disagreements.

struggles over

Substitutes "conflicts" with "struggles", highlighting the effort and contention involved, and "on" with "over" to denote the contested topic.

controversies surrounding

Emphasizes public disagreement using "controversies" instead of "conflicts", and "surrounding" specifies the context of the controversies.

clashes regarding

Uses "clashes" to denote direct confrontation, and "regarding" to introduce the topic of the clashes.

discord concerning

Replaces "conflicts" with "discord" to highlight the lack of harmony, and uses "concerning" to specify the subject of the discord.

tensions involving

Focuses on the underlying stress using "tensions" and indicates the participants or areas affected using "involving".

quarrels over

Replaces "conflicts" with "quarrels", emphasizing the personal nature of the disputes, and "over" specifies the contested issue.

friction concerning

Highlights the underlying tension using "friction", and uses "concerning" to indicate the topic of the friction.

oppositions to

Uses "oppositions" instead of "conflicts", suggesting a contrast in views and "to" to indicate what is being opposed.

FAQs

How can I use "conflicts on" correctly in a sentence?

While "conflicts on" is frequently used, it's often better to use more specific prepositions like "conflicts about", "conflicts over", or "conflicts regarding" for clarity. For example, "conflicts about the new regulations" is more precise.

What's a good alternative to "conflicts on" that avoids ambiguity?

Consider using alternatives such as "disputes about", "struggles over", or "controversies surrounding" depending on the intended meaning.

Is there a difference between saying "conflicts on" and "conflicts about"?

Yes, "conflicts about" is generally clearer and more grammatically sound. "Conflicts on" can sound awkward and doesn't specify the relationship as precisely as "conflicts about", which directly indicates the subject of the conflict.

When is it acceptable to use the phrase "conflicts on"?

While commonly found, using alternative phrasing like "clashes regarding", "discord concerning" or other options can result in improved clarity and precision. The acceptability often depends on context and desired level of formality.