confirmed with

USAGE SUMMARY

"confirmed with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are confirming something with someone, such as verifying a fact or checking an answer. For example, "I confirmed with my manager that the meeting will be held tomorrow."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Mr. Negroponte was confirmed with unexpected ease.

The New York Times

He hasn't confirmed with me for this year.

The New York Times - Style

McIlroy's insurmountable position was confirmed with six holes to play.

The Guardian - Sport

Other sources have confirmed with Ukrainian military sources.

The Guardian

Both reports were confirmed with urine tests.

Science Magazine

I've confirmed with Facebook that it's not.

TechCrunch

These results were confirmed with another survey.

European Transport Research Review

This is confirmed with CT imaging (d).

Insights into Imaging

Islet labeling was confirmed with immunohistochemistry.

EJNMMI Research

Specificity was confirmed with competition experiments.

EJNMMI Research

Aspiration was confirmed with fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "confirmed with", ensure that you are specifying who or what provided the confirmation. Be precise for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "confirmed with" without indicating the source. For example, instead of saying "The results were confirmed with tests", specify "The results were confirmed with urine tests".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "confirmed with" functions as a verb phrase indicating the use of a specific method, tool, or source to verify or validate information. As Ludwig AI points out, this construction is commonly used to express that something has been substantiated or proven by a particular means, as seen in examples like "Both reports were confirmed with urine tests."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "confirmed with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase for indicating the validation of information through a specific method or source. As Ludwig AI confirms, its presence across diverse contexts, including scientific research and news reporting, underscores its broad applicability and acceptance. To enhance clarity, always specify the confirming entity. While alternatives exist, "confirmed with" remains a direct and effective way to denote verification.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

verified by

Focuses on the act of checking and establishing the truth or accuracy through evidence.

corroborated by

Highlights the strengthening or support of a statement or theory with additional evidence.

validated by

Emphasizes the process of officially confirming or demonstrating the accuracy or truth of something.

authenticated by

Stresses the establishment of genuineness or validity, often in a formal or official context.

substantiated by

Indicates that a claim or statement has been supported with sufficient evidence.

attested by

Implies a formal declaration or testimony to the truth of something.

ratified by

Refers to the formal approval or confirmation of an agreement or proposal.

endorsed by

Suggests a public declaration of support or approval.

affirmed by

Highlights a strong declaration or confirmation of a fact or belief.

ascertained through

Emphasizes the process of finding something out for certain.

FAQs

How can I use "confirmed with" in a sentence?

You can use "confirmed with" to indicate that something has been verified or validated by a particular source or method. For example, "The diagnosis was "confirmed with ultrasound"".

What are some alternatives to "confirmed with"?

Some alternatives to "confirmed with" include phrases like "verified by", "corroborated by", or "validated by", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use "confirmed by" or "confirmed with"?

Both "confirmed by" and "confirmed with" are grammatically correct, but they have slightly different meanings. "Confirmed by" emphasizes the source of the confirmation, while "confirmed with" emphasizes the method or tool used for confirmation. For example, "The findings were confirmed by the researchers" versus "The findings were "confirmed with histology"".

What does it mean when something is "confirmed with" a test or procedure?

When something is "confirmed with" a test or procedure, it means that the test or procedure provided evidence to support the truth or accuracy of a finding. This indicates that the initial assessment was further verified through objective means.