Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
"confirmed negative" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used in the context of medical tests or results, indicating that the results of a test have confirmed that something is negative. For example: - The doctor confirmed that the patient's COVID-19 test was negative. - The laboratory results confirmed that the patient's blood test was negative for any infections. - The pregnancy test came back negative, confirming the woman was not pregnant.
Exact(60)
Although no significant difference in the CEA and CA 125 serum level between confirmed positive and confirmed negative PET/CT groups was found, CA 15-3 serum level was significantly higher in the confirmed positive ones.
Specificity is the percentage of confirmed negative residential locations for each distance bin (confirmed negative divided by the orthophoto corrected).
Fever was reported from 4 of 8 passengers with confirmed pandemic (H1N1) 2009, 7 of 16 passengers whose ILI was confirmed negative for pandemic (H1N1) 2009, and 2 of 10 passengers with ILI who were not tested.
Both groups of samples (doubtful and positive results) were later confirmed negative by LC-MS/MS.
Selected nasal isolates that exhibited evidence of haemolysis, but were M. haemolytica-negative based on PCR, were also confirmed negative by phenotypic and FAME analyses.
All rAd stocks were confirmed negative for replication-competent adenovirus by passage on non-permissive cells.
The one confirmed negative test occurred in the "immediate testing group".
A pool of BSE negative-tissue macerate, confirmed negative by S.A.F./O.I.E.
The sheep were confirmed negative for scrapie by IHC for the presence of PrPSc in the brain.
However, 40-cycle RT-PCR was confirmed negative for skeletal and cardiac specific markers in expanded human VPC-derived MC.
As with the TeSeE™ ELISA, confirmed negative tissue samples should be tested alongside diagnostic samples to verify a base-line for true negative tissues.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com