What is the justification for treating properties of a single geometric diagram as representative of all the configurations in the range of a proof?
In a proof about triangles for instance, variation among the configurations in the range of the proof is variation of exact properties e.g., the measure of the triangles' angles, the ratios between their sides.
The co-exact properties of a diagram can be shared by all geometric configurations in the range of a proof, and so in such cases one is justified in reading off co-exact properties from the diagram.
It has been observed that the combination of ribs and dimples resulted in higher heat transfer augmentation as well as higher thermal hydraulic performance when compared with ribs alone and dimples alone configurations for the range of Reynolds number studied.
The flow configuration in the range of interest has not been described previously.
This correlation is valid for coil geometry with alternating planes of curvature, i.e. chaotic configuration and the range of validity of the correlation is Re∈[100 300], Pr∈[30 100] and Nbends∈[3 13].
The performance module enables a more detailed shielding analysis, providing the particle size that is "stopped" by a user-defined shielding configuration over the range of relevant in-orbit impact conditions.
For simulations of non-sympatric speciation, we varied the geographic configurations of the ranges to be either vicariant, peripatric and parapatric.
In the current configuration, the operational range of the CCNS has been verified to be between 0.08% and 0.9% supersaturation, with potential for further range enhancement.
Note that, given the difference between initial (random) and optimal-macrostate configuration, the dynamic range of decorrelation is larger than it appears to be.
