Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Similar(60)
The relative configuration of glucose anomeric proton was confirmed as β on the basis of the coupling constant (J 1′, 2′ = 7.8 Hz).
The 1 H NMR spectrum indicates anomeric protons (4.6-5.2 4.6-5.2ugar ppmtonsugar0-3.9 protonsd the signal at higher field (δ 4.526) corresponds to β configuration of glucose.
The configurations of d-glucose and l-rhamnose for compounds 1 5 were determined by comparison of the retention times of the corresponding derivatives with those of standard d-glucose and l-rhamnose giving a single peak at 19.01 and 15.43 min, respectively.
The configurations of D-glucose and D-galactose for compounds 4– 7 were determined by comparison of the retention times of their corresponding derivatives with those of standard D-glucose and D-galactose giving a single peak at 10.669 and 10.969 min, respectively.
Suboptimal configuration of the glucose units could have precluded extensive interaction of the glucose units with the ASGPR.
Two configurations for SHCF of glucose and xylose were used to investigate the effect of controlled wheat-starch hydrolysate feed on the xylose uptake.
The J value (7.0 xbHz) of the anomeric proton concluded the β-configuration of the glucose moiety.
Because of the configuration of the glucose residues, hydrogen bonds form at great density both within and between chains, a density that gives cellulose an elastic modulus rivaling that of steel but makes the structure impervious to degradation whether chemical or enzymatic.
In this paper we have presented the usage of optical remote configuration for the estimation of glucose concentration in blood.
Approximately 50% of the sugars in the filter cake were recovered, corresponding to a 30% increase in the total amount of glucose added in Configuration C, compared with Configuration D (when the filter cake was not washed).
The first configuration was used for assessment of glucose and xylose co-fermentation in the SPWS hydrolysate.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com