conducting with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "conducting with" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be an attempt to convey collaboration or interaction, but it is not a commonly accepted expression. Example: "The team is conducting with the new software to improve efficiency."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Riccardo Chailly conducting, with Arkadi Volodos, pianist.

The New York Times

Stratford is compelling here, too, conducting with tremendous fire.

The Guardian - Music

He studied conducting with Leonard Bernstein at Tanglewood.

The New York Times

He also studied conducting with Serge Koussevitzky at Tanglewood.

The New York Times - Arts

Abbado conducting, with Catherine Geyer, soprano, Philharmonic Hall, 7 30.

The New York Times

Mr. Sheng, right, came from China in 1982, and studied composition and conducting with Leonard Bernstein.

The New York Times

Mr. Quasthoff has Mr. Thielemann's exquisitely articulated conducting, with forces of his Deutsche Oper Berlin.

The New York Times - Arts

He subsequently studied conducting with Hans Swarovsky and made his podium debut in 1986.

The Guardian - Music

He looks much better and more fit, and is conducting with seeming focus and bountiful energy.

The New York Times

She began studying conducting with Wu Lingfen, a woman whose teacher had also been female.

The New York Times - Arts

Salonen, conducting, with impressive coolness and no evidence of frenzy, was impassioned nonetheless.

The Guardian - Music

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Replace "conducting with" with more precise and grammatically correct phrases such as "collaborating with", "working with", or "performing with" to ensure clarity and professionalism.

Common error

Avoid using "conducting with" to describe collaborative efforts; it incorrectly implies direction rather than cooperation. Instead, choose phrases like "collaborating with" or "working alongside" to accurately reflect the mutual nature of the activity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "conducting with" functions as a verb phrase attempting to describe an action performed in conjunction with something else. However, as Ludwig AI indicates, it's often grammatically incorrect and should be replaced with more precise alternatives.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Academia

28%

Science

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

9%

Wiki

6%

Formal & Business

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "conducting with" appears frequently across diverse sources, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. It attempts to convey collaboration or direction, but should be replaced with more appropriate phrases like "collaborating with", "working with", or other contextually relevant alternatives. Its presence in news, academic texts, and general web content suggests a neutral to informal register; however, due to its grammatical issues, it is best to avoid using "conducting with" in formal or professional writing to ensure clarity and correctness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

collaborating with

Emphasizes a cooperative effort, replacing the notion of direction with mutual contribution.

working with

A general term for being involved in a project or activity together.

performing with

Specifically highlights the act of engaging in a performance together, more suited for musical contexts.

executing with

Focuses on the implementation aspect, implying precision and control in carrying out a plan.

undertaking with

Implies starting or engaging in a task or project, highlighting the initiation phase.

managing with

Highlights the supervisory and organizational aspects of a task or project.

dealing with

Addresses the act of handling a particular issue or problem.

handling with

Focuses on the management and care taken in addressing a situation or object.

in conjunction with

Emphasizes actions being done together or in combination.

alongside with

Indicates partnership or working next to another person or entity.

FAQs

Is "conducting with" grammatically correct?

No, "conducting with" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's best to use alternatives like "collaborating with" or "working with" instead.

What's a more professional way to say "conducting with"?

For professional contexts, use phrases like "collaborating with", "managing with", or "executing with" depending on the intended meaning.

How can I use "conducting with" in a sentence correctly?

It's generally recommended to avoid "conducting with" in formal writing. Rephrase your sentence using "working with" or another appropriate alternative to ensure grammatical accuracy.

What is the difference between "conducting with" and "collaborating with"?

"Conducting with" implies a hierarchical relationship where one party is leading or directing, whereas "collaborating with" suggests a more equal and cooperative partnership.