Sentence examples for conducted litigation from inspiring English sources

She went to work for the Interior Department in 1999, where she provided legal advice, developed regulations and conducted litigation, then left government in 2001 to work as vice president for government affairs and general counsel for American Rivers, an advocacy organization.

Lady Carnarvon saw this as blackmail and persuaded her new husband to take his wife to court for what Sir Henry McCardie, who tried the case, called "the most bitterly conducted litigation I have ever known".

On Wednesday night, the players were considering sending a letter to the league, offering to meet to conduct litigation settlement talks with a mediator.

The government cannot be seen as conducting litigation with the enormous implications of this litigation -- litigation imbued with significant public interest -- in such a way as to select by which forum as between the Supreme Court of the United States and an inferior appellate court it wishes to be bound.

The league itself estimated 28percentt of retirees will suffer from brain damage in their lifetime in a 2014 report conducted during litigation between the NFL and former players.

"Previously disclosed uncertainties remain, particularly relating to conduct and litigation matters," the bank said.

U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor, of the Northern District of Texas, enjoined the policies nationally and blocked the federal government from conducting any litigation or attempting to bring school districts in compliance with them.

Initially the department contracted private law firms to actually conduct the litigation, but in 1903 the office of the Commonwealth Crown Solicitor was established, with Charles Powers the first to hold the job.

Costly litigation, conducted in open court, would rarely be worth it and would open the door to duress at the end of relationships.

He said the union gave those cards to the labor board in January to request a unionization election, but none has been conducted because of litigation and because the board concluded that conditions were not right for an election.

Because the court "insists upon litigation conducted by state officials whose preference is to lose the case," Kennedy continued, the majority's decision "means that a single district court can make a decision with far-reaching effects that cannot be reviewed".