Thus, learned response patterns (e.g., established via classical conditioning) might trigger "automated" responses (e.g., food avoidance) to certain odorants.
Unlike non-pharmacological conditioning, which triggers the release of our natural opiates, pharmacologically conditioned biochemical responses are very specific, because the biochemicals triggered are identical to those induced by the active drug.
And as reported on Right Wing Watch, conspiracy broadcaster Rick Wiles suggested that Ford was a sleeper agent whose conditioning was triggered by the use of the word "lodestar" in the op-ed by an anonymous administration official which was published by the New York Times.
For example (as shown in Fig. 2E), by the third trial the conditioning tone triggered a robust dynamic trajectory, which started from the Rest ellipsoid, moved quickly to the conditioned Tone (CS) ellipsoid and then came back to the Rest ellipsoid.
We hypothesize that these differential neuronal mechanisms may reflect the distinction between motivational processes engaged through a core instrumental conditioning process triggered by direct receipt of primary rewards, such as juice, and a more cognitive process that helps to interpret delayed and symbolic rewards, such as money.
Whereas standard HFS failed to induce LTP prior to McSA1 treatment, the same conditioning protocol triggered LTP in the same TG animals when injected with the antibody.
Whereas the 100 Hz conditioning protocol triggered robust STP and LTP in WT littermate controls (132.1 ± 1.5 and 140.6 ± 4.3% at 5 and 60 min post-HFS, respectively; P < 0.05 compared with baseline), this was not the case in TG rats (112.3 ± 1.5 and 96.1 ± 1.6%, respectively; P < 0.05 compared with the WT group).
In this sense, the odor learned during conditioning would not only trigger an appetitive response (such as the extension of the proboscis), but would also promote rewarding properties inducing persistent appetitive arousal.
In classical conditioning, the conditioned stimulus (CS) is initially a neutral stimulus that does not naturally trigger a response from the test subject, while the unconditioned stimulus (US) elicits a natural response.
Beyond the question of tenancy type, there is a rich literature on the triggers and/or conditioning factors for the adoption of HSP.
