Correct responses for each condition, instructions, and errors were modelled separately in the design matrix.
An independent rater not involved in the study and unaware of condition membership will judge whether each writings, randomly ordered, will conform to condition instructions.
A 3-between (Condition: ER instruction, control instruction, no training) ANOVA was conducted with participants' emotional state after watching the follow-up videos as the dependent variable.
A 3-between (Condition: ER instruction, control instruction, no-training) ANOVA was conducted to investigate the extent to which ER had become habitual in the three conditions at follow-up.
Twenty-seven performednts performap map navigation tasks using a simulated speech navigation system in three experimental conditions: instructions containing no landmarks, instructions containing landmarks located without reference to either the traveler's body or the surrounding environment, and instructions containing landmarks located with respect to the traveler's body.
We conducted a 2-between (Condition: control instructions vs. ER instructions) × 3-within (Training session: first, second and third) mixed design ANOVA to investigate the effect of training on participants' HRV.
In the control condition, an instruction was given in which no specific information regarding the actress' behavior was provided (neutral instruction condition).
This was not possible because the subjects in the synapomorphy condition before instruction performed at ceiling, with a mean accuracy of 0.97 (using the partial-credit scoring scheme described in experiment 1).
For the semantic condition, the instruction "Abstract" appeared, and the task was to judge whether the word had an abstract meaning or not.
Respondents were asked to sort the Q-sample using the condition of instruction, "Please sort these statements with respect to your opinion of the current system of emergency medicine in Serbia".
