concurring

USAGE SUMMARY

The word 'concurring' is correct and can be used in written English.
It is usually used in the context of agreement, or to express a shared opinion or sentiment. Example Sentence: We all concurred that the project needed to be completed by the end of the week.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It seems we have something to learn from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, whose concurring opinion today in Holt v Hobbs, a religious liberty case involving a Muslim inmate's beard, came in at 65 words, including references and parentheticals.

The Economist

Now, with the Palestinians and the Israelis concurring about one thing only that matters will get far worse before they perhaps get better the gloom may spread even faster.

The Economist

In fact, a couple of the American judges had appended "concurring" comments in which they slightly outdid their colleagues in their support for religious bodies' autonomy.

The Economist

But a concurring opinion contained the remark that the government should show the "necessity" of forcing reporters to testify.

The Economist

In two terse, concurring opinions barely covering five single-spaced pages, the board said that the role of students who are paid for research and teaching was "indistinguishable from a traditional master-servant relationship".

The Economist

Justice Potter Stewart, concurring with the court's majority opinion, said "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description, and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so.

The Economist

But whatever their interpretation of the eighth amendment, seven justices agreed that Kentucky's method was lawful.While concurring, Justice John Paul Stevens declared that he no longer believed the death penalty itself to be constitutional.

The Economist

Concurring with Marshall's opinion in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), he defended the regulatory power of Congress over interstate and foreign commerce; over one of Marshall's few dissents, he upheld, in Ogden v. Saunders (1827), state power to alleviate economic distress.

Encyclopedia Britannica

A number of Latin American countries, however, give priority to local creditors if there are concurring bankruptcies (simultaneous proceedings in more than one country) involving the same debtor.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Justices Thurgood Marshall and John Paul Stevens filed opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "concurring" when you want to convey a sense of formal agreement, especially in legal, academic, or professional contexts. It often implies a thoughtful and considered alignment of opinions.

Common error

Avoid using "concurring" in casual conversations or informal writing. Simpler alternatives like "agreeing" or "yes" are usually more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "concurring" is that of a present participle or gerund, often functioning as an adjective describing an agreement or an opinion that is in alignment with another. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Encyclopedias

25%

Science

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "concurring" is a versatile term primarily functioning as a present participle or gerund, used to express agreement, especially in formal contexts such as legal, academic, and professional settings. Ludwig AI validates its correct and frequent use. While simpler alternatives like "agreeing" exist, "concurring" adds a nuance of thoughtful alignment. Its usage is widespread across News & Media, Encyclopedias, and Science. Remember to use "concurring with" and avoid overly informal settings. By considering these aspects, you can effectively integrate "concurring" into your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

agreeing

Direct synonym emphasizing alignment of opinions or feelings.

in agreement

More formal way to express that parties share the same view.

of the same mind

Suggests a deeper, more philosophical alignment.

in accord

Emphasizes harmony or agreement in action or policy.

coinciding

Highlights simultaneous occurrence or agreement.

harmonizing

Implies a pleasing or aesthetic agreement.

aligning

Suggests a deliberate effort to match or agree.

consistent with

Highlights logical agreement or compatibility.

subscribing to

Expresses adherence to a particular belief or view.

assenting to

Formal agreement, often used in legal or official contexts.

FAQs

How to use "concurring" in a sentence?

"Concurring" is often used to describe agreement, especially in formal settings like legal or academic discussions. For example, "The justices were "concurring in the judgment"."

What can I say instead of "concurring"?

You can use alternatives like "agreeing", "in agreement", or "coinciding" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "concurring with" or "concurring to"?

"Concurring with" is the correct and more common usage. You concur with someone or something, not to it.

What's the difference between "concurring" and "agreeing"?

"Concurring" typically implies a more formal or considered agreement than "agreeing". "Concurring" is often used in legal or official contexts.